RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03387
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her records be corrected to show her Date of Enlistment (DOE) as
26 Jun 1958.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her NA Form 13038, Certification of Military Service, reflects
her DOE as 15 Sep 1958, which is incorrect.
Her correct DOE is 26 Jun 1958 and she requests her records be
corrected to ensure an accurate federal document and for
Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) benefits.
In support of her request, she provides copies of her NA Form
13038, AF Form 186, Individual Record Education Services
Program; and marriage certificate.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
According to Special Order Number B-1110 dated 16 Sep 1958, the
applicant entered active duty on 15 Sep 1958.
According to Special Order Number A-646 dated 2 Nov 1959, she
was honorably discharged on 10 Nov 1959.
In a letter dated 18 Mar 2003, AFPC/DPPAOR advised the applicant
that the date she entered the Air Force was properly recorded as
15 Sep 1958.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial. DPSIPV found no error in the
recording of her dates and the Certification of Military Service
was not issued by the Air Force but the National Personnel
Records Center. Special Order Number B-1110, shows she enlisted
in the Air Force and attended Basic Military Training on 15 Sep
1958.
The complete DPSIPV evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit
C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANTS REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 13 Jan 2014, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, this office has not received a response (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. We note the AF
Form 186, Individual Record Education Services Program,
provided by the applicant and verified by her Veterans Service
Officer (VSO) shows a DOE of 26 Jun 1958; however, the AF Form
186 is not a source document for DOE. Special Order B-1110
dated 16 Sep 1958 shows the applicants DOE as 15 Sep 1958 and
is the official source document for DOE. Furthermore, NA Form
13038, Certification of Military Service, also reflects DOE as
15 Sep 1958. The preponderance of the relevant evidence
establishes 15 Sep 1958 as the correct DOE. Therefore, we find
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-03387 in Executive Session on 15 May 2014, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documents were considered:
Exhibit A. DD Forms 149, dated 28 Jun 2013, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicants Available Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPV, dated 16 Dec 2013,
w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Jan 2014.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04914
The from and to dates on his NA Form 13038, Certificate of Military Service, be corrected to reflect 15 Sep 49 through 14 May 57. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial of the applicants request pertaining to his NA Form 13038 indicating the applicant has not exhausted all available...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01894
According to Reserve Order BA-249 dated 19 June 2008, the applicant was promoted to the grade of captain with a DOR of 5 July 2008 in the Reserve of the Air Force. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/JAX recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. To obtain relief, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01381
As a result, his record was corrected to reflect an ADSC expiration date of 23 May 18 for the scholarship program. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He believes his corrected ADSC expiration date is miscalculated for the updated AF Form 63. He agrees with DPSIPVs statement, if the Boards decision is to grant the relief sought, the record will be adjusted to reflect an ADSC expiration date of 23 May 15. However, if the Boards decision is to deny relief, he requests his record be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2011-01437
He was 46 years old and had 29 years of service for retirement. He believes that if he would have been offered a commission when he entered pilot training, he would have been a general officer when he retired. We note the applicant states at the time of his retirement his commanding officer advised him that he had been recommended for promotion to the grade of permanent colonel.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04416
His TFCSD in his records was incorrectly changed from 15 May 10 to 15 Sep 10 The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPV recommends the applicants request be granted. He was told by...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03546
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03546 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect that she entered the Uniform Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) on 14 Sep 81 per Directive Number 974 (Docket No. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00110
The overseas long tour ribbon was omitted based on incorrect Foreign Service time on her DD Form 214. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIPV states that the applicants DD Form 214 reflects an incorrect Date Entered Active Duty (Item 12a) and will be corrected to read 12 Aug 77. However, both the DD Form 214 and DD Form 215, Correction to the DD Form 214, reflects the applicants full service time.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05388
Had she known she would have been eligible for DVA benefits after two years of service, she would have held out for four more days to qualify. On 9 May 1984, she submitted her application for early separation due to pregnancy with a requested separation date of 15 Sep 1984. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00654
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAN defers to AFPC Service Dates Verification Office to address/validate the applicants first lieutenant DOR, but does provide information pertaining the applicants appointment in the grade of first lieutenant. In accordance with AFI 36-2008, she received 50...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04216
The applicant contends that the date of enlistment of 16 June 1951 and date of discharge of 28 October 1958 are incorrect. We note that after a review of the applicants available records, the Air Force office of primary responsibility has confirmed that his enlistment and discharge dates are incorrect and recommend correction. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force...